No Montana For Old Elon?

Following up on Farewell Montana Skeptic? a chronicle of how Tesla CEO Elon Musk phoned a long time critics employer and threatened to sue the critic....
"The employer clearly has no interest in getting involved in a dispute with a guy last seen calling a cave rescue hero a "pedo," to say nothing of the psycho fans roaming the internet doxxing and attacking anyone they perceive as being a threat to their favorite car company, and frankly it's kind of hard to blame him." - Reddit - EW_Niedermeyer
In a response to a Twitter user asking if the CEO had called Montana Skeptic, Musk stated that he had “never heard of this girl” and it “was probably her Mom.

Musk then Tweeted the following image of Miley Ray Cyrus, known for portraying the Disney Channel character “Hannah Montana,” with the caption: “They grow up so quickly.
Needless to say, above Tweet was quickly deleted from Musks Twitter account.  Moving West....

At A Tribute To SA's Most Famous Tesla Critic: Montana Skeptic (SA) (YouTube Podcast) we Nattered to author and fellow MS supporter Quoth The Raven...

QTR,

"I don't even know where to begin when addressing the fact that the CEO of a $55 billion company is now apparently singling out his critics one by one and possibly trying to silence them."


Excellent work and a friend of MS, is a friend of mine. Where does one begin? One CEO going after one critic? Is not the truth, the truth?


One might be aware that MS and his employer have a track record of standing up to and winning in court against those who: thrive on bullying, intimidation, duress, and threat; abuse the legal system to violate the civil rights of others; practice the arts of self dealing, concealment and misrepresentations; commit embezzlement, theft and fraud; and conspire to violate federal securities laws.


See The Pirate Attack On Yahoo, 2001....


TNN


All in all, Elon Musk goes from calling a man involved in the Thai cave rescue mission a “pedo" to singling out an anonymous critic for outing and litigation threats? 

In doing so, the CEO of a struggling, never profitable company with $60B in market cap, which just posted its largest quarterly loss at $717M, utilizes information derived from doxxing, and tweets risque material regarding the critics nom de plume?  

For the moment, put sanity or complete lack thereof aside, at the end of the day... 
it's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.
Certain individuals clearly fit neither adjective.  Where does it all end? Shall we hear from Montana Skeptic nevermore?  Me thinks not, the rest, is silence.

Comments